<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My life with the Shrill Shill Kult</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boohaven.com/2008/06/02/my-life-with-the-shrill-shill-kult/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boohaven.com/2008/06/02/my-life-with-the-shrill-shill-kult/</link>
	<description>A minimal webcomic about one or more ghosts, updated weekdays</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 16:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://boohaven.com/2008/06/02/my-life-with-the-shrill-shill-kult/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 22:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boohaven.com/2008/06/02/0069-having-just-watched-the-dnc-rules-committee/#comment-109</guid>
		<description>Oh, also "pigheaded" and "obstinate" are basically synonymous! GOSH DANG</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, also &#8220;pigheaded&#8221; and &#8220;obstinate&#8221; are basically synonymous! GOSH DANG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://boohaven.com/2008/06/02/my-life-with-the-shrill-shill-kult/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 22:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boohaven.com/2008/06/02/0069-having-just-watched-the-dnc-rules-committee/#comment-107</guid>
		<description>Well, it does sound a bit circular, but then she already missed out on my vote, and for different reasons (that's the "all else aside" bit). I have no vote to withhold, so I don't think that I'm putting her in a catch-22. I'm just glad she didn't get the nomination.

In retrospect, I think the problem with my statement is just that it doesn't really mean much, since it was basically made under the assumption that her campaign was dead. Really, it more or less amounts to "neener neener".

Oh well. &lt;em&gt;Politics&lt;/em&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it does sound a bit circular, but then she already missed out on my vote, and for different reasons (that&#8217;s the &#8220;all else aside&#8221; bit). I have no vote to withhold, so I don&#8217;t think that I&#8217;m putting her in a catch-22. I&#8217;m just glad she didn&#8217;t get the nomination.</p>
<p>In retrospect, I think the problem with my statement is just that it doesn&#8217;t really mean much, since it was basically made under the assumption that her campaign was dead. Really, it more or less amounts to &#8220;neener neener&#8221;.</p>
<p>Oh well. <em>Politics</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://boohaven.com/2008/06/02/my-life-with-the-shrill-shill-kult/#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 15:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boohaven.com/2008/06/02/0069-having-just-watched-the-dnc-rules-committee/#comment-104</guid>
		<description>Not that I disagree with you, but I've always felt something odd about that sentiment. It's almost like saying "If Hillary wants my vote, she should drop out of the race."

I guess it's just a catch-22 that weirds my shit out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that I disagree with you, but I&#8217;ve always felt something odd about that sentiment. It&#8217;s almost like saying &#8220;If Hillary wants my vote, she should drop out of the race.&#8221;</p>
<p>I guess it&#8217;s just a catch-22 that weirds my shit out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

